What might Gregor Samsa’s transformation into an insect symbolically represent?

Gregor Samsa’s transformation into an insect is not merely a physical deformation, but a radical allegory of existential dissolution. This transformation carries a multifaceted meaning, both psychoanalytically and philosophically:

  1. The Bodily Manifestation of the Lacanian “Real”

Gregor’s insect body embodies Lacan’s concept of the “Real”: a traumatic excess that can never be fully grasped by the symbolic order (language, society, family).

Body-surplus: The loss of the human form renders Gregor’s social identity (worker, son, debt payer) impossible. The insect body is a grotesque manifestation of what cannot be represented within the symbolic order.

The Mirror Stage Collapse: For Lacan, the self is constituted through identification with the mirror image. Gregor, however, encounters an unrecognizable reflection: His body no longer reflects the imaginary totality.

  1. Freudian Superego and Castration Anxiety

The Father’s Symbolic Violence: Hermann Kafka’s deeming his son “inadequate” can be interpreted as the superego’s destructive influence on Gregor’s transformation into an insect. The father metaphorically “castrates” Gregor – he can no longer participate in either the family or society as a “man” (a productive individual).

Neurotic Guilt: Gregor feels unconscious guilt for being freed from the burden of providing for his family. His insect body embodies punished desire (the desire to be free).

  1. The Dissolution of Heideggerian “Being-in-the-World”

The Loss of Zuhandenheit: According to Heidegger, humans find meaning in the world through their practical relationship with tools (zuhanden). Gregor’s legs can no longer carry a salesperson’s bag – his instrumentality has vanished.

The Rejection of Das Man: The social “They” (das Man) sees Gregor as a “function.” His insect body is a denial of this collective identity. He is no longer a being who “cannot be-himself” (uneigentlich).

  1. The Kierkegaardian Paradox of Anxiety and Freedom

The Dialectic of Illness-Death: Gregor’s transformation embodies Kierkegaard’s concept of “deadly illness” (despair): “The unwillingness or inability to be oneself.”

The Irony of Freedom: Gregor is freed from the oppression of his family, but this freedom is trapped in the passivity of an insect. The “cage” metaphor in Kafka’s diaries reflects this double grip.

  1. A Reading of Deleuze-Guattari’s “Kafka: For a Minor Literature”

The Insect as a Desire-Machine: Gregor’s transformation is a resistance to the desire codes of the capitalist family. His body becomes a “flow” that shatters subjectivity.

Minorization: Gregor escapes the dominant codes, both linguistically and physically. Becoming an insect is a radical form of disidentification.

The Body is a Manifesto of Alienation

Gregor’s insect body:

A “nothing” thrown outside the symbolic order,

The collapse of modern man’s instrumentalized existence,

The undeniable yet unbearable burden of the Name-of-the-Father (Nom-du-Père).

With this transformation, Kafka asks the question:
“How can one endure living in a body alienated from oneself?”
The answer is the relief felt in Gregor’s last breath: death is the expression not of his final alienation, but of his final discovery.